Which is the Latest in the #HeismanWatch?
This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments over whether the nation’s top judicial watchdog should have the right to review the deliberations of the nation as a whole.
The decision comes after a three-year-old Supreme Court ruling ruled that the president and the court itself are the most important institutions in a democracy.
In February, the Court made it a requirement that the judicial branch has the right and ability to review any executive decision made by the president.
The court also required the Supreme Judicial Council, which is tasked with overseeing the judicial system, to take up the case.
In April, a unanimous Supreme Court panel decided to review a lower court ruling that said a Texas judge had been improperly removed from the bench for speaking out against President Donald Trump.
The decision came after a federal appeals court ruled that a state court judge had violated a restraining order that had been issued against her.
The appellate court also found that the state had violated the First Amendment by failing to comply with a court order that it provide documents related to the case to the Trump administration.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it would consider whether the state of Texas violated the constitution when it removed the judge from the court’s bench for a controversial speech.
A majority of the justices ruled that “the President has the power to dismiss a judicial officer from the office of judge, jury, and executioner for the performance of his judicial duties without the consent of the Senate and House of Representatives.”
On Friday, the court sent the case back to the lower courts for further consideration.